Reshaping IT management for turbulent times – (McKinsey Quarterly)

Despite decades of increasingly intensive use of information across industries, IT has remained a black box for many executives. Too often, the link between spending and performance has been unclear, if not problematic. As a result, leaders felt that their only course of action was to hire a competent CIO, throw increasing amounts of money at IT, and hope for the best. The economic disruptions of recent years, however, have tightened budgets and placed a premium on action, forcing companies to rethink IT’s fundamental role.

In most organizations, IT began as a support function, leading to a one-dimensional management approach. However, technology-enabled products, interactive communications, and an “always on” information environment have thrust IT to the forefront, with critical implications for business growth and customer engagement. In addition, established practices, such as lean-management techniques, have highlighted the value of IT in reducing waste and increasing productivity.

This deeper recognition of IT’s potential has given rise to a new management model consisting of two categories: “Factory IT” and “Enabling IT.” Factory IT encompasses the bulk of an organization’s IT activities, applying lessons from the production floor—scale, standardization, and simplification—to drive efficiency, optimize delivery, and lower unit costs. Enabling IT is focused on helping organizations respond more effectively to changing business needs and gain a competitive advantage by spurring innovation and growth.

This approach goes beyond simply relabeling functions to include broader leadership, governance, and organizational changes, and IT leaders will need very different skills to manage each model. Business leaders will have to engage with IT in new ways. For instance, while IT standardization and consolidation increase responsiveness, speed to market, and cost effectiveness, managers may have fewer options to customize solutions. Likewise, more transparency and better metrics may come at the expense of unrestricted choice for configuration and architecture. In return, business leaders would get a new type of IT partner to support innovation, with skills to deliver IT-enabled capabilities quickly that drive both top- and bottom-line growth. But they’ll need to treat such IT staff as full members of their group, offering incentives and rewards for exceptional performance.

To read full article inclusive exhibits click https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Business_Technology/Application_Management/Reshaping_IT_management_for_turbulent_times_2707

Fehlendes Management-Wissen bremst “Corporate Sustainability”

Die britische Organisation “Business in the Community” hat eine Studie bei mehr als 700 Führungskräften durchgeführt und über die strategische Bedeutung von Nachhaltigkeit für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft befragt. Dabei wurde aufgezeigt: obwohl Nachhaltigkeit als unternehmenskritisch angesehen wird, mangelt es den meisten Managern an den entsprechenden Fähigkeiten.

Die wichtigsten Erkenntnisse der Studie:

  • Mehr als 90% der befragten Unternehmen betrachten Management-Skills zur Nachhaltigkeit als brisant
  • 90% der Unternehmen sehen den Bedarf, ihre Mitarbeiter mit den notwendigen Fähigkeiten für eine “sustainable economy” auszustatten
  • Nur 15% sehen diese Fähigkeiten und Kenntnisse gut oder auch nur teilweise entwickelt
  • 80% sehen den dringenden Bedarf an Ausbildungsprogrammen für Unternehmen und Mitarbeiter

Die befragten Personen der Studie – britische CEO’s und Firmenlenker – sind sich einig: es muss einen grundlegenden Wandel geben hin zu einer Ökonomie, in der Unternehmen Verantwortung für nachhaltiges Wirtschaften übernehmen. Das drängendste Problem dabei: fehlende Fähigkeiten und Kenntnisse von Managern (70%) zum Thema “sustainable economy”. Die überwältigende Mehrheit ist sich einig, dass großer Bedarf an diesen Fähigkeiten besteht und Bildungsinitiativen über Nachhaltiges Management entwickelt werden müssen.

Mehr als 150 Führungskräfte diskutierten die Ergebnisse der Studie in London und gründeten eine Taskforce, die Aus- und Weiterbildung zum Thema “sustainability” entwickeln soll. Obwohl bereits etliche firmeninterne Bildungsprogramme bestehen und einige Unternehmen bereits den Nutzen von nachhaltigem Management erkannt haben, besteht doch großer Bildungsbedarf. 84% der Unternehmen legen dabei Wert auf Programme, die individuell auf das Unternehmen angepasst werden können.

“Mitarbeiter auf allen Unternehmensebenen brauchen die Fähigkeiten, um ihre Unternehmnen bei den notwendigen Schritten im Klimawandel und in Richtung einer nachhaltigen Volkswirtschaft unterstützen.” (Vincent de Rivaz, CEO EDF Energy)

Die Studie kann eingesehen werden unter http://www.bitc.org.uk/resources/publications/leadership_skills.html

Five Ways to Convince Your CFO that Sustainability Pays

CFOs haven’t been at the center of the corporate sustainability movement. After all, people usually think of us as bean counters, not social activists. But in my job as CFO, sustainability is a strategic imperative. And it should be for your CFO, too. But it’s up to you, as someone who cares about sustainability, to convince your chief financial leader that sustainability matters.

In the wake of the global recession, the CFO’s role has shifted from fancy accountant to co-driver of corporate strategy. We can’t just worry about quarterly results; we must focus on long-term growth strategies, which are inseparable from economic, social and environmental issues. A CFO’s job is about using resources wisely and ensuring that an enterprise can thrive for decades to come. That makes sustainability part of a CFO’s remit. Continue reading

Strategy by Design

Enterprise architecture can eliminate the space between an organization’s technology and its business model.

For years, many companies have experienced a problematic tension between their IT departments and business units. On the one hand, IT works best when it is tied tightly to the company’s overall business goals. That’s why chief information officers have long worked to get a seat at the executive table — to help set the company’s strategic mandate and align IT with the organization’s aspirations. On the other hand, business unit executives remain doubtful about IT’s ability to support them

in creating value. And despite the best intentions of managers on both sides of this gap, companies continue to struggle to integrate IT systems and to determine whether IT actually improves performance, and if so, by how much.

One approach to closing the distance between IT departments and business units is the discipline called enterprise architecture (EA). We define EA as the logical framework that establishes the links between business strategy and organizational structures, processes, databases, and technologies. For example, a bank that wants to capture better customer information in order to energize an effort to sell additional, higher-margin products and services to existing customers would use an EA system to align its customer relationship management, information retrieval, and sales planning software. At the same time, EA applications would be set up for staff training, account management, and frequent assessments of the campaign’s efficacy. The goal of EA is thus twofold: to add value through its support of business goals and to enable companies to measure the value added.

Continue reading

8 Valuable Lessons Newspapers Must Learn From Bloggers to Survive

By Leo Babauta on Write to Done


The news has been democratized.

It’s not news that the news industry is changing rapidly, and the traditional newspaper and magazine industry is in a whole mess of trouble.

Newspapers are losing readers at an alarming rate to online reading — and readers are reading not only newspapers, but blogs and many other types of sites.

Newspapers are trying to find a model for making money online, but they’re not learning fast enough, not adapting fast enough. Online ads can’t support them, because now the monopoly for publishing news and commentary has been broken, and advertising has been spread out among thousands and thousands of sites.

How can the newspaper industry adapt? Well, they’ll either have to figure that out quickly, or they’ll die. Continue reading

In The Downturn, Green Companies Outperform

A recent study by global management consulting firm A.T. Kearney indicates that firms with “true commitment to sustainability” outperform industry peers in the financial markets. The study, called Green Winners: The Performance of Sustainability-Focused Companies During the Financial Crisis, found that in 16 of 18 industries, sustainability-focused companies outperformed their peers by 15% in a six-month period. The performance differential translated to an average of $650 million in market cap per company.

021109ATKearneyChartSmall

The big takeaway for me is seeing that the companies prospering now were the companies who embarked on this journey ten years ago, well before it became a media-worthy item. Now these companies have pulled ahead of the pack in terms of competitive advantage and are building momentum.

The report cited as an example a global consumer packaged goods company that “views sustainability as not just a philanthropic endeavor but a fundamental part of its business strategy.” It began its sustainability efforts more than 10 years ago and has incorporated sustainability practices in every link of the value chain.

Despite increasing production volume by 76 percent since 1998, and over the same period reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 16 percent, water consumption by 28 percent and energy use by 3 percent, according to the report. In 2007, improvements in energy efficiency led to a $30 million savings. Over a 16-year period, the company saved more than $500 million by optimizing packaging volume.

And it’s not just about savings.

IBM has generated $500 million in new contract signings in 2 quarters from their Big Green initiative. Clorox is projecting $40 million in first-year sales from its GreenWorks line.General Electric vowed to improve the energy efficiency of its operations by 4% a year and double its revenues from relatively clean products to $20 billion by 2010.

This is a trend that is not going away. If your business hasn’t committed to baking in sustainability (and/or a social-good outcome that’s more directly related to your business) into your business strategy, the mounting data on both consumer expectations and competitive advantage suggest that you will be left behind.

More: In The Downturn, Green Companies Outperform | The Green Economy Post: Green Careers, Green Business, Sustainability.